Legislative reform
What’s the issue?
Over the course of three years and twelve meetings the RCVS Legislation Working Party (LWP) explored over 56 reform proposals, from fundamental questions to relatively minor changes. The outcomes will have far-reaching implications for the profession – including significant changes to the disciplinary process, the possibility of mandatory practice regulation, and potential revalidation for vets. Read the report of the RCVS Legislation Working Party.
RCVS has also made an additional set of recommendations, relating to the disciplinary process, which do not require primary legislation and could be implemented ahead of the recommendations from the LWP report.
What’s our view?
We strongly support the RCVS commitment to progressing as a modern, fit for purpose regulator. We consider that legislative reform must be based around the principles of right-touch regulation, as identified by the Professional Standards Authority (PSA), and ensure that the level of regulation is proportionate to the level of risk.
Many of the RCVS recommendations are inextricably linked and careful consideration must be given to a holistic approach and the chronology of change. This must be underpinned by a culture shift at RCVS which fosters trust and ensures that the changes are embraced by all as being beneficial to animal health and welfare and the professions. Accountability and transparency must feature as key principles in the transition.
Appropriate resourcing must also form a key element of the final package. Some of the proposals are extremely ambitious and will necessitate significant funding and administrative resourcing. It is essential that the College ensures the proposals can be funded adequately and appropriately such that the desired outcomes are realised. Approaches to funding must also be transparent to the professionals who pay to be on the Registers and should not result in a financial burden for members.
Our response to the RCVS legislative reform consultation was developed by five working groups, under the broad headings of:
Read our policy documents
Get involved
- Contact our policy team for more information.